[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174492966.16411.1.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:02:46 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
ck@....kolivas.org, Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:57 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 'f' is a progglet which sleeps a bit and burns a bit, duration depending
> on argument given. 'sh' is a shell 100% hog. In this scenario, the
> argument was set such that 'f' used right at 50% cpu. All are started
> at the same time, and I froze top when the first 'f' reached 1:00.
May one enquire how much CPU the mythical 'f' uses when ran alone? Just
to get a gauge for the numbers?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists