linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sysctl: vfs_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:01:32 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"J.H." <warthog9@...nel.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: vfs_cache_divisor

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:22:33 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >> The we duplicate all the relevant /proc knobs:
> >>
> >> cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> >> 30
> >> cat /proc/sys/vm/hires-dirty_ratio/
> >> 300000
> >>
> >> Or we do something else ;)
> > 
> > Sounds better.  I wasn't very keen on the userspace interface that this
> > exposed.  Will look at those.
> > 
> 
> Okay... may be I could throw a spanner in the machinery, and suggest 
> another option: perhaps we should add a way to do sysctl which can 
> handle fractional (fixed-point) values... more coherent/detailed message 
> tomorrow.

I prefer the fixed-point values for pressure and dirty* to having
duplicated entries for each of them.  I'll proceed with that idea.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/