[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070321161140.457a3cd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:11:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "J.H." <warthog9@...nel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: vfs_cache_divisor
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:01:32 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:22:33 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The we duplicate all the relevant /proc knobs:
> > >>
> > >> cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> > >> 30
> > >> cat /proc/sys/vm/hires-dirty_ratio/
> > >> 300000
> > >>
> > >> Or we do something else ;)
> > >
> > > Sounds better. I wasn't very keen on the userspace interface that this
> > > exposed. Will look at those.
> > >
> >
> > Okay... may be I could throw a spanner in the machinery, and suggest
> > another option: perhaps we should add a way to do sysctl which can
> > handle fractional (fixed-point) values... more coherent/detailed message
> > tomorrow.
>
> I prefer the fixed-point values for pressure and dirty* to having
> duplicated entries for each of them. I'll proceed with that idea.
>
Problem is, if a read of /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio is changed to return
7.457 then existing userspace might get confused.
This might be acceptable if we are careful to ensure that reads of
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio will always return an integer if it was previously
initialised with an integer.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists