linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] SLAB : NUMA cache_free_alien() very expensive because of virt_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703201715110.17799@graphe.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <christoph@...eter.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SLAB : NUMA cache_free_alien() very expensive because of
 virt_to_slab(objp); nodeid = slabp->nodeid;

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> I understand we want to do special things (fallback and such tricks) at
> allocation time, but I believe that we can just trust the real nid of memory
> at free time.

Sorry no. The node at allocation time determines which node specific 
structure tracks the slab. If we fall back then the node is allocated 
from one node but entered in the node structure of another. Thus you 
cannot free the slab without knowing the node at allocation time.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/