[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703201716440.17799@graphe.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <christoph@...eter.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SLAB : NUMA cache_free_alien() very expensive because of
virt_to_slab(objp); nodeid = slabp->nodeid;
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Is it possible virt_to_slab(objp)->nodeid being different from pfn_to_nid(objp) ?
> >
> > It is possible the page allocator falls back to another node than
> > requested. We would need to check that this never occurs.
>
> The only way to ensure that would be to set a strict mempolicy.
> But I'm not sure that's a good idea -- after all you don't want
> to fail an allocation in this case.
>
> But pfn_to_nid on the object like proposed by Eric should work anyways.
> But I'm not sure the tables used for that will be more often cache hot
> than the slab.
We usually use page_to_nid(). Sure this will determine the node the object
resides on. But this may not be the node on which the slab is tracked
since there may have been a fallback at alloc time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists