| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070322090632.GB15328@elte.hu> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:06:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Folkert van Heusden <folkert@...heusden.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lockdep_depth vs. debug_locks Re: [2.6.20] BUG: workqueue leaked lock * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 07:11 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > Here is some joke: > > > > [PATCH] lockdep: lockdep_depth vs. debug_locks > > > > lockdep really shouldn't be used when debug_locks == 0! > > This happens then lockdep reports a fatal error, at which point > it will stop tracking locks and leave whatever state was there. > > > Reported-by: Folkert van Heusden <folkert@...heusden.com> > > Inspired-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> > > Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> > > This looks sane, thanks for figuring this out. > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists