[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070323230021.GX752@stusta.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:00:21 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David L <idht4n@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:23:17PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> Subject : gettimeofday increments too slowly
> >> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8027
> >> Submitter : David L <idht4n@...mail.com>
> >> Caused-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >> commit 92c7e00254b2d0efc1e36ac3e45474ce1871b6b2
> >> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >> Status : problem is being debugged
> >
> > Patch available: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/301
> >
> > commit 6b3964cde70cfe6db79d35b42137431ef7d2f7e4
> >
>
> For the other issue raised there, clock running too slow, I now
> realize there is a similar report:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231626
It shouldn't be the same issue:
2.6.20-1.2925.fc6 is based in 2.6.20.3-rc1 while this issue is a
2.6.21-rc regression.
Or do the -rc kernels include parts of the -rt patchsets?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists