linux-kernel - Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46045D30.2020702@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:05:20 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC:	tglx@...utronix.de, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David L <idht4n@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>>
>> For the other issue raised there, clock running too slow, I now
>> realize there is a similar report:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231626
> 
> It shouldn't be the same issue:
> 2.6.20-1.2925.fc6 is based in 2.6.20.3-rc1 while this issue is a
> 2.6.21-rc regression.
> Or do the -rc kernels include parts of the -rt patchsets?
> 

Sometimes problems leak from the next kernel version into -stable
via the stable kernel patches.

Other times the bug may have been there all along but nobody had
found it yet...


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/