[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08FE5CC30C9A3F41BF819A502CF7BF6EF55DD2@fmsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:24:23 -0700
From: "Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
To: "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.20.3] Flush writes to MSI-X table
Greg KH wrote:
>Well, I'm sure you can agree that it is _very_ late in the 2.6.21
>release cycle to expect to get this in for that kernel. How about
>waiting for 2.6.22 and if it's a big deal, getting it into the
>2.6.21-stable tree if needed.
>
>So far I have not seen any bug reports that this patch would fix, have
>you?
Well, I've seen several bug reports on this issue -- but they're all
internal to Intel.
However, we do have here a real bug, which shows up on real hardware,
which will be released soon. Obviously, I can't discuss release
schedules, but "soon" is a good word to use. You might find out more if
you read The Register (wink, wink).
Given the time frame for release of 2.6.21, I'd be fine with skipping
2.6.20.x, and putting this in 2.6.21. But we really don't want to wait
for 2.6.22.
I'll take Auke's suggestion and repost this Monday and cc linux-pci and
a slew of other people.
-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists