[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070324002802.GA18061@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:28:02 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: "Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20.3] Flush writes to MSI-X table
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 05:24:23PM -0700, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >Well, I'm sure you can agree that it is _very_ late in the 2.6.21
> >release cycle to expect to get this in for that kernel. How about
> >waiting for 2.6.22 and if it's a big deal, getting it into the
> >2.6.21-stable tree if needed.
> >
> >So far I have not seen any bug reports that this patch would fix, have
> >you?
>
> Well, I've seen several bug reports on this issue -- but they're all
> internal to Intel.
>
> However, we do have here a real bug, which shows up on real hardware,
> which will be released soon. Obviously, I can't discuss release
> schedules, but "soon" is a good word to use. You might find out more if
> you read The Register (wink, wink).
Ok, but again, as this is something that no one outside of a company can
see, it doesn't really make sense to rush it into the kernel.
> Given the time frame for release of 2.6.21, I'd be fine with skipping
> 2.6.20.x, and putting this in 2.6.21. But we really don't want to wait
> for 2.6.22.
I think it needs to wait, especially given that there is no public
hardware yet.
I'll add this to my queue.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists