linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Code reordering in swsusp breaks suspend on SMP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200703251710.12842.maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:10:12 +0200
From:	Maxim <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Code reordering in swsusp breaks suspend on SMP systems

On Sunday 25 March 2007 14:13:07 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:40, Maxim wrote:
> > On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote: 
> > Hi,
> > 	I confirm that the above patch works,
> > 
> > 	At least system didn't hang on resume with microcode driver loaded,
> > 
> > 	I can't really test whenever it did update microcode because I almost sure there is nothing to update
> > 	(I use core 2 duo that I bought a month ago, and an intel motherboard with latest bios ( updated yesterday) )
> > 	I selected this driver just in case when I compiled kernel.
> 
> OK, thanks for testing.
> 


Hello,
	I tested this patch, and it does work too,
	System suspended /resumed correctly, no errors in kernel log
	


> -	first_cpu = first_cpu(cpu_present_map);
> -	if (!cpu_online(first_cpu)) {
> -		error = _cpu_up(first_cpu);
> -		if (error) {
> -			printk(KERN_ERR "Could not bring CPU%d up.\n",
> -				first_cpu);
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -	}
> -

Nice, I once have seen those lines too, and they look ridiculous, but could that be that they are still necessary on some systems,


Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/