[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174942147.5713.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:49:07 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, safford@...son.ibm.com,
serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
zohar@...ibm.com, staubach@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 5/7] integrity: mtime patch for mmap files
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:09:58 -0400 Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > mmaped files are hashed and hmac'ed properly by EVM after being modified
> > when the file's mtime is updated correctly. Peter Staubach's 'memory
> > mapped files not updating timestamps v2' patch properly updates the
> > mmapped file's mtime. In those cases when an application does not
> > first msync the file before calling munmap, the mtime is eventually
> > updated, but not before file_close is called. This patch forces the
> > mtime for mmaped files to be updated in a timely manner.
>
> I don't think we've ever had that patch in -mm?
We are basing the EVM code on Peter's '[PATCH] memory mapped files not
updating timestamps v2' patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/255 on the
assumption that it would be accepted. I guess that has not yet happened.
Mimi Zohar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists