linux-kernel - Re: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:51:39 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Noriaki TAKAMIYA <takamiya@...ntts.co.jp>
Cc:	usagi-core@...ux-ipv6.org, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL]
	[USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:15AM +0900, Noriaki TAKAMIYA wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> >> Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:55:21 -0700
> >> [Subject: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.]
> >> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote...
> 
> > >   Yes, this problem was already fixed.
> > 
> > Great, thanks for testing.  So I guess both of these patches are no
> > longer necessary, right?
> 
>   I think so. But I wonder if usb_get_serial_port_data() should check
>   the argument for the other drivers.

I don't think it is really necessary, do you?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/