[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070327225006.GC4478@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:50:06 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE option
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:03:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:02:51 +0200,
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
>
> > This patch removes the PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE option that had already
> > been marked as broken.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Documentation/pci.txt | 4 ---
> > drivers/base/dd.c | 41 ++-------------------------------------
> > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 25 -----------------------
> > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 15 --------------
> > include/linux/device.h | 1
> > 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>
> Greg, what about driver-core-per-subsystem-multithreaded-probing.patch?
> PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE shoudn't be broken with that, only in mainline?
Do you want to enable PCI multithreaded probing using your patch? I
don't think the world is ready for pci multithreaded probing as was
determined by the zillion of bug reports from people who like to enable
config options that state in big letters, "THIS WILL BREAK YOUR BOX"...
And I'm still questioning if we should add your patch at all, as I don't
think any other subsystems need it. Do you?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists