linux-kernel - Re: [patch] remove artificial software max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0703301813120.31834@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:16:16 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] remove artificial software max_loop limit


On Mar 30 2007 02:25, Ken Chen wrote:
>
> Oh, crap.  Google mail is innocent.  It was me who did some ugly
> copy-paste between apps.

Well, you did it again :p

> I don't mind either way, this thing won't be bigger than 1^20 anyway.
> Oh, which reminds me that we probably should explicitly test and cap
> that limit (1^20 that is).

I do not think is needed, since it will already be caught by the
layout of a dev_t.

> +static struct loop_device *loop_find_dev(int number)
> +{
> +	struct loop_device *lo;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(lo, &loop_devices, lo_list) {
> +		if (lo->lo_number == number)
> +			return lo;
> +	}

Can do without {}


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/