lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070330141524.5f6cff29.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:15:24 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Ken Chen" <kenchen@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] remove artificial software max_loop limit

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:25:37 -0700
"Ken Chen" <kenchen@...gle.com> wrote:

> -module_param(max_loop, int, 0);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_loop, "Maximum number of loop devices (1-256)");

So..  this change will cause a fatal error for anyone who is presently
using max_loop, won't it?  If they're doing that within their
initramfs/initrd/etc then things could get rather ugly for them.

I don't know how much of a problem this will be in practice - do people use
max_loop much?

btw, did you test this change as both a module and as linked-into-vmlinux?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ