[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704012040220.15102@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:42:59 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] kconfig-dynamic-frequency.diff
On Apr 1 2007 14:39, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>
>> Make HZ fully configurable through menuconfig.
>>
>> Already posted at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/18/111
>
> Instead of that, what about something like this instead: NOTE: I know my
> mailer mangles diffs and this one was hand-edited based on Jan's diff from
> within my mailer so it probably doesn't apply, but it's enough to point out the
> idea:
> config HZ
> - int
> + int if !HZ_CUSTOM
> + int "Customized HZ value" if HZ_CUSTOM
> default 100 if HZ_100
> default 250 if HZ_250
> default 1000 if HZ_1000
People always come up with new complexities I never thought kconfig
would be able to do. Nice stuff. I'll take up on your idea and
incorporate it right away.
But I would have to ask: Why do we need 100/250/300/1000 if there is
anyway an input field for the user to enter - s/he should read the
help text for Known Good values, should not s/he?
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists