[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2E204ACD-E697-42C6-8F01-22C1B7B4A85B@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:52:15 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] kconfig-dynamic-frequency.diff
On Apr 01, 2007, at 14:42:59, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> But I would have to ask: Why do we need 100/250/300/1000 if there
> is anyway an input field for the user to enter - s/he should read
> the help text for Known Good values, should not s/he?
Actually, probably what should be done is make the "HZ_CUSTOM" option
depend on EXPERIMENTAL/
EMBEDDED/"EXPERT"/"I_KNOW_WHAT_THE_HELL_IM_DOING" or some other
equivalent option, because a wrong choice for HZ has the potential to
really screw up a system. For example, 10000+ would make most
systems spend a significant portion of their time processing timer
interrupts and context switches, and less than 100 or so would make
the system seem jerky. The point is to encourage the average kernel
builder not to change from one of the default options unless they
really know what they're doing.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists