[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <460F4E35.10109@kroon.co.za>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:16:21 +0200
From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@...on.co.za>
To: Pedram M <pmessri@...il.com>
CC: kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] my first janitorial
Pedram M wrote:
> How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
> If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
> doing wrong.
You need a changelog entry (or explanation of what you're doing). You
need a signed-off-by line and your patch needs to apply to the root of
the kernel tree with -p1, something like:
-------------
Replace deprecated pci_find_device call with pci_get_device.
Signed-Off-By: Pedram M <pmessri@...il.com>
--- linux-2.6.20.3.orig/path/to/file.c 2006-06-24 09:41:08.000000000
+0200
+++ linux-2.6.20.3/path/to/file.c 2006-07-15 21:01:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -4760,7 +4760,7 @@
for (i = 0; i < NR_CARDS; i++) {
/* look for a Cyclades card by vendor and device id */
while ((device_id = cy_pci_dev_id[dev_index]) != 0) {
- if ((pdev = pci_find_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CYCLADES,
+ if ((pdev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CYCLADES,
device_id, pdev)) == NULL) {
dev_index++; /* try next device id */
} else {
-------------
And your subject needs to please include the string "[PATCH]", something
like: [PATCH] path/to/file.c: pci_find_device cleanup
However, as pointed out, the code itself is incorrect, for every
pci_get_device there also needs to be a call to pci_put_device in order
to maintain reference counts.
Your client does not seem to be clobbering the patch itself and
maintains tabs and line wrapping (unlike my client).
Jaco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists