linux-kernel - Re: [-mm3 patch]Warning fix: check the return value of kobject

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2375c9f90703312346t5cf9f85x7f2a13df6cfa1d6d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:46:50 +0800
From:	"Cong WANG" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [-mm3 patch]Warning fix: check the return value of kobject_add etc.

2007/4/1, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:20:46 +0800 "Cong WANG" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > Also, please always prepare patches in `patch -p1' form, as per
> > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt, thanks.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Sorry. I am confused with this. Does that mean I should make patches
> > _upon_ the root kernel source directory or first make a copy of the
> > original source code and then diff against the two dirs? But I was
> > told that "patches should be based _in_ the root kernel source
> > directory" and when only one file was modified just to diff it with
> > the original single file. (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches.)
>
> The headers should look like:
>
> --- a/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c
> +++ a/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c
>
> I don't know how people do that.  One obvious way is to do
>
> cd /usr/src
> diff -u linux-orig/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c linux-new/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c
>
> other people probably alter the diff headers.

Oh, thanks. I know.

>
> > And should I remake this patch?
>
> Sure, but please change it to perform correct error handling first.  And
> test that error handling, if you can.  That will involve adding artificial
> errors.
>

I will remake it soon and send it again.

In fact, I have just tested it roughly. And I don't how to produce
artificial errors. Sorry, I hope someone can help me to test it
carefully.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/