[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070402135446.GL3728@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:54:46 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes
On Fri 30-03-07 06:59:23, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and
> > fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are:
> > 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB.
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried 2.6.20 with your patches and got the following behaviour:
>
> $ ls -la dvd.udf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4699717632 Mar 29 15:36 dvd.udf
> $ mount -o loop -t udf dvd.udf /media/udf/
> $ df /media/udf/
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /home/storage/dvd.udf
> 4588506 -8584746354 8589334860 - /media/udf
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> $ ls -la /media/udf/
> total 4587521
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 144 Mar 29 15:36 .
> drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 1024 Mar 20 12:02 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4697620480 Mar 29 15:57 bk_usr.tar
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Mar 29 15:36 lost+found
Looking more into this it looks like a bug in accounting of free blocks
than some overflow. Was dvd.udf a freshly created image by mkudffs? Are
there any errors in the log or did fs report anything like ENOSPC?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists