[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461117BB.5040705@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:48:27 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes
Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 14:06:34 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> Tino Keitel wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and
>>>> fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are:
>>>> 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB.
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tried 2.6.20 with your patches and got the following behaviour:
>>>
>>> $ ls -la dvd.udf
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4699717632 Mar 29 15:36 dvd.udf
>>> $ mount -o loop -t udf dvd.udf /media/udf/
>>> $ df /media/udf/
>>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
>>> /home/storage/dvd.udf
>>> 4588506 -8584746354 8589334860 - /media/udf
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> $ ls -la /media/udf/
>>> total 4587521
>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 144 Mar 29 15:36 .
>>> drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 1024 Mar 20 12:02 ..
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4697620480 Mar 29 15:57 bk_usr.tar
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Mar 29 15:36 lost+found
>>>
>> Is that on a 32-bit machine?
>
> Yes, it's an Intel Core Duo.
Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full.
No problems at all...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists