[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070403161058.GG2456@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:40:58 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, menage@...gle.com,
akpm@...l.org, pj@....com, sekharan@...ibm.com, dev@...ru,
xemul@...ru, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:32:20AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers
> patches. Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving
> containers into nsproxy?
> Has any other development been going on?
I have another update to the rcfs patches more or less ready to go. I
hope to post them out this week.
Note that from user or controller perspective, there should be very
little difference between the two patches. rcfs is, I would say, same as
container patches to the extent of 70-80%. The rest of the difference is
mainly avoiding a new pointer in task_struct and new structures to
represent a task_group.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists