[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070403173048.GL2456@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:00:48 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: sekharan@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, pj@....com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, mbligh@...gle.com,
winget@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, dev@...ru, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:10:35AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > Even if nsproxy objects are made larger a bit, the number of such object will
>
> You're not making them "a bit" larger, you're adding N+M pointers
> where N is the number of container hierarchies and M is the number of
> subsystem slots.
Hmm no .. I currently have nsproxy having just M additional pointers, where
M is the maximum number of resource controllers and a single dentry
pointer. As tasks get moved around in different hierarchies, new nsproxy's get
created to point to proper objects in those hierarchies (which can be done with
just M pointers in nsproxy). I have not considered the case of "search/reuse
nsproxy that has the combination you want" just to keep it simple, but
we should at some point in time do that.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists