[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:01:57 -0400
From: "Adam Kropelin" <akropel1@...hester.rr.com>
To: "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@...e.cz>, "Li Yu" <raise.sail@...il.com>
Cc: <yanghong@...ss.com.cn>,
"linux-usb-devel" <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<hongzhiyi@...ss.com.cn>, "Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] HID bus design overview.
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Li Yu wrote:
>
>> What's the position of hidraw? It only is used when all other driver
>> is not usable on some report? or, it should be stick every working
>> device.
>
> Current implementation (as you can see it in -mm or in my hid.git
> tree) is creating hidraw interface for just every HID
> device/interface. But this will get changed before merge.
>
> Passing just everything to hidraw is not a good option, as this could
> lead to confusion and duplicating of input events (i.e. in-kernel hid
> driver processes the report and generates input_event(), and also
> userland driver obtains data from hidraw and generates input event
> through uinput ... not good).
I apologize for picking up this thread late and asking what may be a
question with an obvious answer...
Will hiddev still exist after hidraw and the HID bus redesign work is
done? I have a widely-deployed userspace app that relies on hiddev, and
I'm looking for reassurance that it will still work as it always has...
--Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists