linux-kernel - Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1175775012.6609.31.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date:	Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:10:12 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:54 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> here's some test results, comparing SD-latest to Mike's-latest:
> 
> re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
> 
>  - thud.c:    this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
>  - fiftyp.c:  noticeable, but alot better than previously!

Hmm.  Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless.  If you have a second, can you
send me a top snapshot?  If you're running many of them, it can take a
bit for the throttle to catch them all.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/