[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070405120802.GB755@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:08:02 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ibm.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vatsa@...ibm.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, mingo@...e.hu,
dipankar@...ibm.com, dino@...ibm.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] __cpu_up: use singlethreaded workqueue
On 04/02, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> Currently i386 and x86_64 __cpu_up uses the services of the kevents
> workqueue to bring the cpu up. Change this and use kthread workqueue
> instead which is single_threaded and won't be frozen during
> CPU_HOTPLUG.
>
> [...snip...]
>
> +void kthreadwq_queue_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + queue_work(helper_wq, work);
> +}
> +
> +int kthreadwq_up()
> +{
> + return (helper_wq != NULL);
> +}
Off-topic question: can't kernel/kmod.c use this workqueue too instead
of its own khelper_wq?
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists