[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4614585F.1050200@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:01:03 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: missing madvise functionality
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:05:54 +1000
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
>
>>>@@ -1638,7 +1652,7 @@ find_extend_vma(struct mm_struct * mm, u
>>> unsigned long start;
>>>
>>> addr &= PAGE_MASK;
>>>- vma = find_vma(mm,addr);
>>>+ vma = find_vma(mm,addr,¤t->vmacache);
>>> if (!vma)
>>> return NULL;
>>> if (vma->vm_start <= addr)
>>
>>So now you can have current calling find_extend_vma on someone else's mm
>>but using their cache. So you're going to return current's vma, or current
>>is going to get one of mm's vmas in its cache :P
>
>
> This was not a working patch, just to throw the idea, since the answers I got showed I was not understood.
>
> In this case, find_extend_vma() should of course have one struct vm_area_cache * argument, like find_vma()
>
> One single cache on one mm is not scalable. oprofile badly hits it on a dual cpu config.
Oh, what sort of workload are you using to show this? The only reason that I
didn't submit my thread cache patches was that I didn't show a big enough
improvement.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists