[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4615982A.1070700@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:45:30 -0700
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bugfix for VMI paravirt ops
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>> So the clean fix for this is still even further out. I don't think I
>> want to hook kmap/unmap as paravirt-ops.
>>
>
> Yes, it seems like overkill.
>
> How about something like adding PARAVIRT_LAZY_FLUSH as an argument to
> set_lazy_mode? It would be valid to use at any time, and it would flush
> any pending work while still remaining in whatever lazy mode its
> currently in. That way kmap_atomic can flush anything pending without
> having to muck around with the current lazy state.
>
Yes, thought about several solutions, and this seems the best. But it
requires a new paravirt-op.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists