linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:48:39 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 05:29:52PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> >That patch got dropped, and replaced by one which pulled all the flags
> >definitions out of <asm/processor.h>
> >
> 
> Saw that a little too late :)
> 
> In general, it would be nice if the various CPU constants were all 
> defined in one place, so I'd rather suggest protecting the appropriate 
> parts of asm/processor.h with #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__.

No processor.h is such a hodgepodge of unrelated stuff that any
splitting up is a good thing.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/