linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46159480.20108@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:29:52 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> That patch got dropped, and replaced by one which pulled all the flags
> definitions out of <asm/processor.h>
> 

Saw that a little too late :)

In general, it would be nice if the various CPU constants were all 
defined in one place, so I'd rather suggest protecting the appropriate 
parts of asm/processor.h with #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/