[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461592AA.4060103@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:22:02 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> There is now more than one place where we use the fact that bit 9 of
>> eflags is the interrupt-enabled flag, so define EFLAGS_IF. We make it
>> 512 so it can be used in asm, too.
>>
>
> How about defining all the other EFLAGS in one place?
>
That patch got dropped, and replaced by one which pulled all the flags
definitions out of <asm/processor.h>
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists