linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1175826248.12230.668.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:24:08 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 18:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > No processor.h is such a hodgepodge of unrelated stuff that any
> > splitting up is a good thing.
> > 
> 
> Fair enough.  However, I'd still like to see the X86_CR* constants 
> moved, too (and constants added for at least CR0 as well.)

Agreed.  This was on theory of minimum damage, but since it seems to
have received a warm reception, I'd say moving the rest to
processor-flags.h would be a welcome addition.

Cheers,
Rusty.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/