[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070409014426.GA18580@thunk.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:44:26 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: If not readdir() then what?
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:28:32PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> >It doesn't state explicitly that you can use the telldir cookie()
> >after closing the directory stream using closedir() and then reopening
> >it using opendir(), but given that it states that results are
> >undefined after a rewinddir() --- which is much less violent than a
> >closedir()/opendir(), I would definitely argue that an application
> >programmer would be very ill-advised to rely on this working.
> >
> >(Of course, I'd argue that an application programmer shouldn't use
> >telldir/seekdir at all.....)
> >
> >Ulrich, is it too late to insert a clarification that the telldir()
> >cookie isn't guaranteed to be valid after closedir() *or* rewinddir()?
>
> More fundamentally, the telldir cookie should never be valid when
> applied to a different DIR * (even one that refers to the same directory.)
Well, Joern thought that rm -rf might relying on the telldir cookie
being valid in precisely that circumstance. If that is true, I'd
argue that this is a BUG in GNU coreutils that should be fixed...
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists