linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070409104948.2bc99202.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:49:48 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code

On Mon,  9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu> wrote:

> The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
> well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.

I have a mental note that unionfs is in the "stuck" state, due to general
agreement that we should implement this functionality at the VFS level, one
reason for which is unionfs's upper-vs-lower coherency problems.

Am I wrong?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/