linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704092149430.22295@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:52:16 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code


On Apr 9 2007 10:53, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>
>The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
>well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.  For detailed
>announcement, see end of this email.

I have to seriously ask: why don't we consider aufs? Without
readvertising its simple codebase, unionfs was (version 1.5pre) not
able to be used as a root filesystem when one of its branches is nfs.
(I figure I should build a testcase for that know that I had
a way to reproduce it for some time.)


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/