[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1176239914.309.54.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:18:34 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: If not readdir() then what?
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 07:12 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday April 10, trond.myklebust@....uio.no wrote:
> > The problem is that it is extremely hard to come up with an alternative
> > that doesn't impose new conditions on what filesystems you can support.
>
> I seem to remember Hans Reiser making a credible suggestion years ago
> when NFSv4 was still in draft. It didn't fly, but I don't really
> remember why.
>
> The NFS server gets to either return a cookie like it currently does,
> or sets a flag (or maybe returns a special cookie) which says 'just
> use the name'.
> A READDIR request contains either a cookie or a filename. Either mean
> "This identifies the last name I got from you, give me the next one".
>
> Is there something that makes that interface problematic?
File deletions...
Cheers
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists