[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704110937060.32056@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:48:21 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/30] Use menuconfig objects
On Apr 11 2007 07:42, Al Boldi wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>Correct, no oversight here; but it may be more meaningful, if you could
>default select child-options based on the parent-state, like HW_RANDOM.
A symbol will already have the 'magic' you describe if its creator wrote
it that way. Changing to 'menuconfig' tokens does not change that I
think. Consider:
menu "foobar"
config FOOBAR
bool "foobar"
default y
config HW_RANDOM
depends on FOOBAR
default y
endmenu
This example should do things as you describe -- if FOOBAR is changed
from n to y, HW_RANDOM should automatically do the same since it is a
new option then.
menuconfig FOOBAR
bool "foobar"
default y
if FOOBAR
config HW_RANDOM
default y
endif
inhibits the same behavior AFAICS.
>Also, I don't think it's necessary to touch any of the "depends on"; keep
>them as is, as they don't hurt staying that way, and may actually be
>necessary under certain circumstances. (see EMBEDDED)
Simplifying the depends lines is a good thing IMO.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists