linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/30] Use menuconfig objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <461D1291.2060703@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:53:37 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
CC:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/30] Use menuconfig objects

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Apr 11 2007 07:42, Al Boldi wrote:
>>Also, I don't think it's necessary to touch any of the "depends on"; keep 
>>them as is, as they don't hurt staying that way, and may actually be 
>>necessary under certain circumstances.  (see EMBEDDED)
> 
> Simplifying the depends lines is a good thing IMO.

If explicit dependency statements are replaced by if--endif blocks, does
this count as simplification?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-- -=-==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/