[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070413112029.GD27914@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:20:30 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] generic rwsems
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:53:49PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Friday 13 April 2007 12:04:16 Nick Piggin wrote:
> > OK, this patch is against 2.6.21-rc6 + Mathieu's atomic_long patches.
> >
> > Last time this came up I was asked to get some numbers, so here are
> > some in the changelog, captured with a simple kernel module tester.
> > I got motivated again because of the MySQL/glibc/mmap_sem issue.
> >
> > This patch converts all architectures to a generic rwsem implementation,
> > which will compile down to the same code for i386, or powerpc, for
> > example, and will allow some (eg. x86-64) to move away from spinlock
> > based rwsems.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> Fine for me from the x86-64 side. Some more validation with a test suite
> would be good though.
David had a test suite somewhere, so I'll give that a run.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists