linux-kernel - Re: [Feature Request?] Inline compression of process core dumps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070413154331.GB23562@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:43:31 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Christopher S. Aker" <caker@...shore.net>,
	"Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@...emetry-investments.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Feature Request?] Inline compression of process core dumps

> so either the comment just above lock_kernel() should be removed, or
> it's correct and lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() should stay.

Ah somehow missed the comment. Ok so it's better to keep it, although
there would be probably better ways to protect the pattern.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/