[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461EE890.2040601@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:18:56 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:42:29 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
>>Maybe. How about LRU? Reclaim performance is bad, and you want to work out
>>which pages keep going off the end of it, or which pages keep getting
>>written out via it, or who's pages are on the active list, forcing mine
>>out.
>
>
> I guess we have static analysis versus dynamic. The interfaces which Matt
> is proposing are suited to answering the question "what is my memory being
> used for" (static). They're unlikely to be useful for answering the question
> "what's happening in the VM" (dynamic). Systemtap is probably better for the
> dynamic analysis.
"what is my memory being used for *now*" ;)
> I guess one could generate an answer to the static question with systemtap,
> by accumulating running counts across the application lifetime and then
> snapshotting them. Sounds hard though.
Can't you just traverse arbitrary kernel data structures at a given point
in time, exactly like the /proc/ call is doing?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists