[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461EE925.1000301@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:21:25 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups
Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:42:29AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>If kprobes is simply crappy and doesn't work properly for this, then I
>>could accept that. I'm not someone trying to get this info. So why can't
>>it be used? (not just for kpagemap, but for clear_refs and all that gunk
>>too).
>
>
> kprobes is good for looking at events, but bad for looking at state.
> Especially metric shitloads of state.
Why? Why is a kprobes trap significantly more expensive than a read
syscall?
>>Maybe. How about LRU? Reclaim performance is bad, and you want to work out
>>which pages keep going off the end of it, or which pages keep getting
>>written out via it, or who's pages are on the active list, forcing mine
>>out.
>
>
> Those are actually probably a good match for systemtap as they're all events.
Traverse the LRU? Which files do they belong to? What process maps them?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists