[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1vefwjehk.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:39:19 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, serue@...ibm.com, viro@....linux.org.uk,
linuxram@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] allow unprivileged umount
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> writes:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> The owner doesn't need sysadmin capabilities to call umount().
>
> Similar behavior as umount(8) on mounts having "user=UID" option in
> /etc/mtab. The difference is that umount also checks /etc/fstab,
> presumably to exclude another mount on the same mountpoint.
>
bool in the kernel?
int would be much more recognizable as this is not C++
Or do you have place to convert the rest of the kernel that is using
int to return a true/false value to bool?
> +static bool permit_umount(struct vfsmount *mnt, int flags)
> +{
> + if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!(mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_USER))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (flags & MNT_FORCE)
> + return false;
> +
> + return mnt->mnt_uid == current->uid;
> +}
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists