[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070416195810.GB16255@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:58:10 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
serue@...ibm.com, viro@....linux.org.uk, linuxram@...ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] allow unprivileged umount
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:39:19PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> writes:
>
> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> >
> > The owner doesn't need sysadmin capabilities to call umount().
> >
> > Similar behavior as umount(8) on mounts having "user=UID" option in
> > /etc/mtab. The difference is that umount also checks /etc/fstab,
> > presumably to exclude another mount on the same mountpoint.
> >
>
> bool in the kernel?
It's there already...
> int would be much more recognizable as this is not C++
>
> Or do you have place to convert the rest of the kernel that is using
> int to return a true/false value to bool?
It's already underway:
$ git log | grep bool | wc -l
123
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists