[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070417085703.GA16645@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:57:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> > list_add_tail(&p->run_list, ¤t->run_list);
[...]
> > shouldnt the list_add_tail() be list_add(), so that task pickup sees
> > the child first? [...]
[...]
> I think that it works because the list we're adding to is not the
> normal runqueue list head, but the parent's list_head on that
> runqueue. Which adds the child directly ahead of the parent... I
> think?
yeah, you are right, i was confused: list_add() adds _after_ the head,
list_add_tail() adds _before_ the head - and in the middle of the list
if we do a list_add_tail() it adds before that entry. So everything's
fine and working as expected :)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists