linux-kernel - Re: AppArmor FAQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	Joshua Brindle <jbrindle@...sys.com>, capibara@...all.nl
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AppArmor FAQ


--- Joshua Brindle <jbrindle@...sys.com> wrote:


> Biba and BLP are only incompatible if they are using the same label, if 
> each object has a confidentiality and integrity label they work fine 
> together

Joshua is correct here, although the original Biba observation was
that flipping BLP upside down results in an integrity model. Trusted
Irix uses (used?) both Biba and BLP.

> (as well as MLS systems work in general that is).

Doh! He had to get the dig in.



Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/