[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070418170652.7bee0952@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:06:52 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg K-H <greg@...ah.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFD] alternative kobject release wait mechanism
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:41:10 +0900,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
<patch>
OK, I hit a bit on the code. Once I saved a reference to the completion
in kobject_cleanup, it seemed to survive a load/unload testloop for a
module registering a device. However, I still dislike this "list of
waiters" approach, it looks too complex...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists