[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704181427470.13500@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:31:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
> > um ... what does APM have to do with legacy PM? two different
> > issues, no?
> Since the patches are going into apm.c and apm was used for suspend
> and poweroff before ACPI was a feature of the hardware, I assume
> there's a relationship. As of 2.6.9 ACPI still couldn't power down
> one of my old boxes, it hasn't been updated since that time, so I
> can't say what later kernels will do.
perhaps i completely misunderstood what i was looking at but when i
submitted a patch to remove "legacy power management," i wasn't
referring to APM. i was talking about the PM stuff even *older* than
that, that's listed as "Legacy Power Management API (DEPRECATED)"
under the PM config menu.
so, politics and scheduling aside, was that earlier patch a reasonable
and correct way to do *that*?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists