linux-kernel - Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070418203612.b4027575.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:36:12 +0200
From:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair
 Scheduler [CFS]

El Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:22:59 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> escribió:

> So if you have 2 users on a machine running CPU hogs, you should *first* 
> try to be fair among users. If one user then runs 5 programs, and the 
> other one runs just 1, then the *one* program should get 50% of the CPU 
> time (the users fair share), and the five programs should get 10% of CPU 
> time each. And if one of them uses two threads, each thread should get 5%.

"Fairness between users" was implemented long time ago by rik van riel
(http://surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.19-fairsched). Some people has been
asking for a functionality like that for a long time, ie: universities that want
to avoid gcc processes from one student that is trying to learn how fork()
works from starving the processes of rest of the students.

But not only they want "fairness between users", they also want "priorities
between users and/or groups of users", ie: "the 'students' group shouldn't
starve the 'admins' group".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/